The new 3d warehouse and its host of problems is why people leave software

moving from 2022 to 2023 took me 30 minutes top, including a crash and an uninstall/reinstall of a pair of extensions.
Considering that services are maintained for 3 versions, you could even lower that time to an average of 10 min a year. Even by really taking your time, it could be done in an hour.

You’re telling us that you’d rather pays 4-8K € to a different company than spend even an hour a year maintaining and updating your software just so you can continue downloading free community models into your multi million dollars projects ?
Plus, Sketchup doesn’t overwrite itself, so you could even have SU20 - 21 - 22 - 23 on your machine just in case.

Maybe it’s time to hire IT, or even get some freelancers, to do that job of compatibility check of new versions and mass deploying afterward. The price difference between a 320€ sketchup and a 4000€ revit would annually cover it.

Does solidworks and revit have the same function as 3d warehouse in sketchup?

you mean included in the app, free, containing hundred of thoushands (millions?) of models of pretty much anything ?
not as far as I know.

Softwares like Revit or Archicad can get BIM (IFC) files from companies - so can SketchUp - and then you have dedicated websites. Some are free, many aren’t, some follow themes…

it seems it works the same with solidworks. a base library and a multitude of websites to go look for stuff.

LIke I said. It’s about the time. We aren’t hobbyists. You’re talking peanut$. Thanks for the input.

1 Like

I’m not a hobbyist. Maintaining, upgrading and training on my tools is part of my job. Not yours I guess.

You’re running an unsupported version of the software, outdated even by support standards, you can’t expect much more input than that.

Why are there so many haters?? I LOVE the new UI for warehouse. Especially image recognition component is a game changer. Do Revit and Solidworks even have communal libraries? Enjoy paying 6x as much by the way.

1 Like

Learning Revit will suck 4 weeks of your time away in an instant. It’s far less intuitive than Sketchup. So if time is the problem don’t go to Revit.

1 Like

Revit is a very good application but it is not a SketchUp replacement. You buy Revit if you need the BIM functions in it. For general 3D modelling it is cumbersome, overpriced and overkill.

1 Like

But how much do you have to spend on extensions to get the same functionality and productivity? If you add a good rendering engine, a few paid plagins, it turns out that maybe in three years the costs will even out. And the time? how much time will you gain? There is a lot of talk here about the fact that sketchub is intuitive and easy to learn. I’ve always emphasized this as well, but the multitude of plugins and their inconsistent interfaces and their support cause a big waste of time, also for learning. Because I don’t think anyone here will deny that the strength of SU lies in extensions and if not for them, it would only be a sketchbook! I will stick to my opinion that SU is suitable for what its name tells us - sketches and preliminary architectural designs and with a render for visualization. Of course, a small design company can use it until some client at the end wants to turn the project upside down.

People are tired of Revit, every year it costs more and more. They continue using it because all their work is on Autodesk’s servers and they can’t exit. Not to mention that most of them have illegal software.
You can have SketchUp and CDE software, a render engine and lots of plugins for 1000€ more or less. I have also a BIM 5D software with that amount of money.


You’re an optimist. In Poland, SU Studio is $1,000 a year. So it’s not as rosy as you write. And it doesn’t change the fact that these many plugins take a lot of time to master them. And then a lot of time for annual installations. And I’m surprised that most people who complain about other programs here have never had contact with them, let alone professional use of them. I also suspect that there is a percentage of those for whom other programs were too difficult. And for them, SU with this long stagnation is an ideal program. So don’t say that “people” are sick of Revit or AC. If you publicly burn your own license for some other program because of switching to SU, then you will gain my credibility. However, the price arguments somehow do not appeal to me because how much does Revit cost and how much does an architect charge for a project? The fact is that for small studios that do not have many commissions, this may go beyond the budget, but a successful architect can afford top-shelf programs, where you have a rendering module, calculations, statements, BIM and many other values.

I have been looking at Rhino 7 these days. It’s cheaper with no yearly payment, it can model anything without loads of plugins as SU seems to require and it also can render scenes. It Can even turn 3D into a drawing with dimensions and more.
For pure designing on ipad Shapr3D is amazing and I use all the time. (Although I do like my SU on Ipad subscription)


Believe me, Revit needs much more time, also needs plugins and it’s more difficult to learn.

I have work with Revit and also dynamo. Moreover, most of my colleagues use Revit and “yes” they are tired of Revit.

However, your problem was 3D warehouse, wasn’t it?


Not even close to the price of Revit, and extensions have permanent licenses so you don’t have to add to the price of sketchup every year. With Revit you’ll also need to invest in a good rendering engine if you want to make decent renders, but there are a lot of free or very cheap rendering engines on the market so Vray isn’t the only option.

I don’t understand why people come to complain and throw hate to the software, then say that they’re ditching it and moving to another one, did you know that you can do that without posting it, if you’ve found a software that replaces sketchup for the same price it’s awesome but I’ll assure you that you’ll have problems with that software as well at any point cause there’s no perfect software, not even autocad that has been around for decades.

This is such a relevant point for those who find upgrades to be painful! While you are trying out the new features of an update, you can always roll back to what has worked. Rely on that while you learn the new!

Yeah, on my mac, I finally removed 22. no particular bugs, no issues, haven’t opened it since the install (I mean I have, but it was to check a bug for someone on the forum… it’s you guys fault :wink: )

On my PC? I still have 22 and 23, mostly because if I suddenly get a bug / crash while in class, I can quickly switch to 22. When 24 is released, I’ll kick 22 out.

The only thing to know, with one subscription you have access to two activations at the same time.
Right now, I’m active on 23 mac and 23 pc, since I’ve got two machines.
But if I try to use 22pc as well, it will see it as a third activation, and I’ll have to go to my profile deactivate everyone.
Activations are not linked to the machine but the version as well. It’s a small thing, but good to know.

Please don’t say ‘FREE’ as its not free. Its like saying that National Health is free but we all pay taxes & national insurance… so its not free. Same goes for this… we pay a high price of annual Sketchup subscription fees to get access to the models… so its Not Free!!!

1 Like

Please, we understood your point in your first message. and again in the second .and again in the third. no need to quintuple post to say “I’m angry”

we get it. no need to spam


We all understood the first post. Making more than one post only harms the users of the SketchUp Community

Increasing the number of your posts does not make you represent more people than one.