Looks like the same video as before.
BTW, I was thinking about your dimension method. There’s a better way.
In your case, if you are giving the contractor a ±1/4 in. tolerance for the dimensions, your chained dimensions can result in a fairly huge error. Working from right to left, the door can be anywhere from 3’-10 1/4" to 3’-10 3/4" from the corner. And then the first window can be anywhere between 6’-0" and 6’-1/2" from the center of the door and the next window can be anywhere between 5’-8 1/4" and 5’-8 3/4" from the first one. By the time you get to the left hand corner, that 3’-9" dimension you show could wind up being somewhere between 3’8 1/2" and 3’10" and still meet the print and the 19’4 1/2" dimension. Your 3’-9" dimension must then have a greated than ±1/4 in. tolerance. Each dimension uses the center of the previous opening as the datum.
A better way to dimension this and wind up with the actual built more closely to the way you design it is to dimension the centers of the openings to a single datum. In my example, below, I’m using the right hand corner. With this dimensioning and the same ±1/4 in. tolerance, each opening will be much closer to where you designed it to be. This method does not create a conflicting dimension, either. It would also be easier for the builder to mark out because the have something to hook their tape measure to for all of those dimensions.
