Let's hide this one (too long)
I guess itās about interpretationā¦ For example:
When I read that last half of the sentence āso I have no UI at allāā¦ I pretty much automatically start to fill in the missing word, and I just add in the word āvisibleāā¦ and that only happens because I feel that it is implied in the context of the comment. Itās not even something I think about, I just understand that the spirit of the comment is that it would read something like one of the follow options:
- āSo I have no visible UI at allā
- āSo I have no UI showing at allā
- āSo I have no visible UI showing at allā
they all mean basically the same thingā¦ and if I were to shorten them to a minimal formā¦ Iād just say it as it was written āSo I have no UI at allā.
However, in a way technically you win on this, because you are right in a strict and literal sense. The original comment on itās own does say that he has no UIā¦ and that of course canāt work for all of the reasons that you have been pointing out.
But for whatever reasonā¦ I just fly right over all thatā¦ and fill in the blank because the overall discussion is about hiding part of the UI and showing SU in Full Screen Modeā¦ and at that point we are talking about various forms of āvisibilityāā¦ Tool bars that hideā¦ modeling space that gets zoom in on. So I lock into to automatic interpretation mode without even thinking about it.
ā
The main exception I took to your commentā¦ is that I DO assume the all users who run software primarily by KB shortcuts tend be more advanced, and more experienced.
Beginner donāt know what KB shortcuts are, and why they are so useful. And advanced user usually do.
If you think about it. itās built into the very nameā¦ The so called āshortcutā is a shortcut across the UI itself, or at least the graphical UI as it maybe should be called.
So, Iām simply giving the advanced users the credit of knowing what the UI is, because they know it well enough to understand that they can take a shortcut that speeds up their workflow. And in that sense I wouldnāt turn around and tell them that they might be confused about what a UI is.
The disingenuous term is that Iām also assuming that you know all this stuff tooā¦ and likely even more. So I was surprised, and wrongly suspicious about what you might have been trying to sayā¦ if one were to start reading between the lines.
You have to remember some of the subtle jabs that were made towards SU prior to all of thisā¦ How many times was it mentioned that other āProfessionalā programs have adopted Dark Mode so therefore SU should to. Thats all fine, and it gets a pass if used once or twice. But when it gets mentioned much more than thatā¦ I start to see an undercurrent message that suggests that SU is NOT a Professional Program, because Itās not using Dark Mode.
So the combination of the twoā¦ is what I reacted to. And general personal shortcomings account for a number of misplaced sensitivities.
Anyhow, You are a nice guy Anoammarā¦ and I donāt have a big problem deleting a bad statement out of my comment (just tell me what you want to see goneā¦ even if itās the whole thing, and I"ll get rid of it)ā¦ this is your thread and I didnāt intend to cause troubleā¦ But I did intend to stick up for a couple of people who I thought were being framed in the wrong light.
Itās more than safe to say that they likely do know what a UI is, and they are probably not too confused.
ā
As far as your so called āEnglishā goesā¦ Did you happen to notice how many times I edit my own comments? My post above it already sitting at 7 edits (and it will probably be up to 13 by the middle of next week)ā¦ and itās not going to be too long before this one start to climb the ladder eitherā¦ Yet somehowā¦ if I take a look at yours I canāt find anything wrong with them. You havenāt had to edit even One. . . So Iām pretty much NEVER going to blame your English (that which is better than my own) for too much of anythingā¦ trust me on that. It seems to be very good.
Take Care,
Jim