PolyLine Tool

Is there at Poly Line Tool plugin available for SketchUp Pro? And if not maybe and addition to SK-2020?

I’m not sure. It is not exposed to the Ruby API. I am hoping though that this changes.

The FreehandTool can create them (by holding the SHIFT key.).

There is also a Weld plugin that claims to create “polylines” but I think that they may just be irregular curve objects.
https://extensions.sketchup.com/extension/c0b7472a-c268-48b4-b694-6825760a9ff5/weld

The reason I say this is that in SketchUp, Polyline objects are not geometry. They are simple lines.
So welding edges, arcs and curves together should result in one long geometry curve object, which will intersect other geometry. SketchUp Polylines will not intersect with geometry.

FAIK they can only be manipulated to exact length and placed to exact location/direction by being placed in a container. Even with SketchUp’s native tools. Though time consuming. A good plugin could help to convert simpele geometry into a 3D visual reference.

How would such a tool differ from the normal line tool?

A 3D Polyline tool? One that creates 3D Polylines?

The Fredo Bezier Spline plugin has several polyline tools that may, or may not be of interest.

1 Like

Aren’t we drifting away from the 3D polylines?

From the plugin description page I linked:
“Bezier Spline draws a variety of Polylines, Bezier and Spline Curves, all in 3d”

1 Like

Correct. But I was hoping for information about the 3D Polyline (created by the ‘Freehand’ tool plus [Shift]. My bad.

I have yet to understand the use for those weird lines.

2 Likes

For those questioning … (I thought I explained it above,) …

SketchUp Polylines are not geometric edges. They are a collection of 1 to many actual line segments that do not intersect or interfere with real geometry (edges or faces, etc.)

@IanT … I’m not sure if Fredo’s extension or the Smustard extension (but I doubt it,) actually convert geometry to Sketchup Polyline objects. These objects are not exposed to the Ruby API, which means coders would have to use the old dimension hack by saving a component that contains a manually drawn unit length polyline and insert scaled & transformed instances in a temporary group and somehow stitch them together. (Still unsure how.)

Operationally, it would be very nice if it worked the same or similar to the Edge tool.
(This could mean the current tool might have a modifier other than SHIFT, [which I find weird for any tool,] since SHIFT is inference lock/toggle. CTRL would make more sense to me.)

At some time past you yourself (I think prior to dashed layers) had asked Trimble for a way to depict the overhang of kitchen cabinets (on a top view,) without intersecting geometry. To do this kind of thing, annotational (non-intersecting) lines and polylines would need to be implemented.

So, my challenge to coders is:
What kinds of nifty 3D features and plugins could you use such annotational lines for ?

Slope symbols ?
Ramp direction arrows ?
Complex section lines ?
Ordinate dimension lines ?
Piping schematics ?
Wiring diagrams ?
Camera animation paths ?
Object animation paths ?
Animation skeleton lines ?
Connections between objects (which plugins can use for behavioral features ) ?

2 Likes

Would grouping lines together and changing their line type in layers be similar enough to polylines? I think you could use TIG’s 2D Tools to change line thicknesses too.

If you are asking me, no. Again, you are speaking of edges which are geometry and intersect other geometry. Polylines do not and need not be grouped just to keep them separate. Further they need not be 2D. Piping schematics are often 3D and printed in isometric.

TIG’s plugin doesn’t really change thicknesses. It adds more “lines”. It’s just “smoke and mirrors”.

1 Like

Why would polylines be separate from edges?

EDIT: Now I realized SketchUp has a separate Polyline entity. I’m still not sure if this is what @durroy wants, or just continues straight lines which is what polyline usually refers to.

Yes, and to avoid confusion they are mentioned 3D Polylines in ‘Entity Info’ and can hardly be tamed. When doing so they can be useful as visual reference.

1 Like

Uh huh. And … if you select one and inspect it, it’ll say it’s a Sketchup::Drawingelement. So no exposed class for the Ruby API but likely a dedicated “typename” string. They’ve been partially exposed in the C API but Thomas says he’s not sure if the Dev Team wants to keep them.

I think they could have great uses. But coders would need access to their vertices, need to be able create them via a factory method passing in points, and need to be able to edit them by inserting vertices between existing, and merge with other polylines. Stipple or dashes would be great also.

This struck a chord with me because of its overlap with the dash feature recently added to layers. It always seemed to me that dashed is annotation rather than geometry, which is why it shouldn’t intersect with geometry. Being able to do it with a non-geometry polyline might be a more useful answer. Of course, I have no clue what issues surround the existing Polyline that led the developers to exclude it from the Ruby API or to be unsure they want to keep them.

2 Likes

Exactly why I was unimpressed with the dashes as they were implemented.

And more intuitive. Stipple is naturally a property of a line-like object.
But instead it’s implemented as a property of a display behavior (layer) attached to multiple objects.

2 Likes

Thanks for all the information.