The head and tail stock are just sort of temporary parts. I’m planning to redo them and make them look decent.
From looking at that, I doubt it was modeled the way I was thinking it was. Interesting approach. And thank you!
How were you thinking it was modeled?
I was thinking that you used lofting, but from the HG view, I’m doubtful that was what you used. If you ever want to do four hours live to “re-do” this I’d watch! lol
I don’t know. I’m not sure I could handle the pressure like @TheOnlyAaron does. With all those viewers pestering him and talking and answering questions. I need more practice to get as good as he is with that stuff. Hard to beat his process.
Agreed there! I’ve totally blown it when I have a client looking over my should after they request a simple change.
I think aaron is a pretty good teacher
I do, too.
I do also!
And self-depreciating, he makes me feel better about all the mistakes and redoes I make whilst modeling.
When I use Fredo SUclock, the statistics tell me erase is about 50% of my work flow. Oh well!
James Watt’s Balls, shot by a friend of mine today.
Not everyone has the balls to be Governor.
A comma between Balls and shot, would have painted a less graphic picture in my mind, of James Watt’s body parts shooting by your friend today.
And I thought I was the only one making mistakes and re-dos all the time
Is it possible for a woman to get pregnant without intercourse?
Ce qui t"es arrivé m’arrive aussi très souvent. C’est de la bonne vibration !
Trop vrai!
Very nice. I appreciate the fact that it’s a solid component. As much as i try to use simple and straight-forward modeling techniques I often lose the solid component in the process. Great job!