Thanks!
I think so, but I donāt recall a clear answer. I suppose I could use the search function.
Edit: A lot of times when looking at samples in person, Iāve seen people spread water over the sample to simulate itās finished look, with stone as well as wood.
No problem!
Yeah, I definitely havenāt been using components muchā¦they seem like a lot of work when Iām trying to move quickly so I usually just group things. Now, I see why components are the better choice!
Sometimes yes. We usually wet the slabs with a little bit of water after milling prior to photographing so the colouring is closer to the look of finished wood. But if I have a photograph of dry unfinished wood Iāll often pop it in photoshop and use the linear burn setting on the paintbrush with a light umber colour on about 35% opacity to make it look finished
Itās not so bad! If you get used to using the keyboard shortcut G, it creates your components even faster than making a group, then you can go and grab them in the future from your components list.
I replied to your earlier question! Itās easy in photoshop if you know what settings to use, and I put a screenshot and instructions in the other answer. But wetting the wood does work if you can get at it to take another picture
Thatās great! So, both ways really (digitally and physically).