# Why no SketchyPhysics for sketchup 2016

**URL:** <https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482>\
**Category:** Extensions\
**Created:** [February 16, 2016, 4:28am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482 "2016-02-16T04:28:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gomez.hrgr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/41988e/32.png) [@gomez.hrgr](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/gomez.hrgr)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2016, 4:28am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/1 "2016-02-16T04:28:16Z")

</div>

I really want to know why there is not an SketchyPhysics for sketchup 2016

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catamountain](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/catamountain/32/48_2.png) [@catamountain](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/catamountain)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2016, 4:42am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/2 "2016-02-16T04:42:25Z")

</div>

FYI, you should have posted in the extension forum…

Developing plugins consume a lot of time. SP used the Newton Physic engine, which is in the public domain, so someone using that engine cannot be financially compensated. So it got to a point that the original developer of SP had enough and stopped working on it. Some other people have voluntarily updated SP. And someone has produced another, similar plugin. Go over to SketchUcation download.

I really want to know why people who want to use that plugin rarely contributed their time to help develop that open-source plugin project.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thomthom](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/thomthom/32/12606_2.png) [@thomthom](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/thomthom)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2016, 10:17am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/3 "2016-02-16T10:17:48Z")

</div>

> [@catamountain](#):
>
> And someone has produced another, similar plugin. Go over to SketchUcation download.

For the record, this alternative is MSPhysics  
[http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=56852#p516427](http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=56852#p516427)

GitHub repository here (MIT license): [GitHub - AntonSynytsia/MSPhysics: A NewtonDynamics wrapper for SketchUp.](https://github.com/AntonSynytsia/MSPhysics)

> [@catamountain](#):
>
> I really want to know why people who want to use that plugin rarely contributed their time to help develop that open-source plugin project.

I think that’s a general issue with the SketchUp extension community - not too many collaborations despite a large number of free projects and people helping each other on the forums. I’m trying to figure out what it would take to encourage people to get more actively engaged in using GitHub/BitBucket and avoid reinventing the wheel all the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catamountain](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/catamountain/32/48_2.png) [@catamountain](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/catamountain)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2016, 11:44pm UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/4 "2016-02-16T23:44:33Z")

</div>

Chris did try to encourage collaboration with SketchyPhysics over at [Google Code Archive - Long-term storage for Google Code Project Hosting.](https://code.google.com/archive/p/sketchyphysics/). But one can see [Google Code Archive - Long-term storage for Google Code Project Hosting.](https://code.google.com/archive/p/sketchyphysics/source/default/commits?page=1) who did all the work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jim\_foltz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/jim_foltz/32/74787_2.png) [@jim\_foltz](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/jim_foltz)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2016, 11:58pm UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/5 "2016-02-16T23:58:06Z")

</div>

The Ruby part was always available, but Chris never did share the source for building the binaries. That is what is needed for making the 64 bit port.

[http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=514255#p514255](http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=514255#p514255)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catamountain](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/catamountain/32/48_2.png) [@catamountain](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/catamountain)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 12:11am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/6 "2016-02-17T00:11:50Z")

</div>

I’m not surprised he held onto something. He started the Google code site and wiki way before the forum was added to SketchUcation. He was hoping for collaboration, but that fell flat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cotty](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/cotty/32/251290_2.png) [@Cotty](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/Cotty)\
**Post date:** [February 17, 2016, 6:35pm UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/7 "2016-02-17T18:35:20Z")

</div>

Both SketchyPhysics 3.7.1 and MSPhysics work in SU16 (SP only with 32-bit, MSP with 32- and 64-bit SU).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gomez.hrgr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/41988e/32.png) [@gomez.hrgr](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/gomez.hrgr)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2016, 3:12am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/8 "2016-02-18T03:12:40Z")

</div>

where can I find it?

This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.  
[www.avast.com](http://www.avast.com) [https://www.avast.com/sig-email](https://www.avast.com/sig-email)  
\<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2\>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catamountain](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/catamountain/32/48_2.png) [@catamountain](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/catamountain)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2016, 3:50am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/9 "2016-02-18T03:50:43Z")

</div>

thomthom provided a direct link above for MSPhysics. And [search SketchUcation](http://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?listtype=1&author=0&category=0&search=sketchy+physics&submit=%3F).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gusdelfin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/gusdelfin/32/5028_2.png) [@gusdelfin](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/gusdelfin)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2016, 4:23am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/10 "2016-07-11T04:23:16Z")

</div>

I have Sketchup 2014 and install MSPhysics, but I do not know use it.  
¿Why it does not work the plugin sketchyphysics?  
Thanks for your answers.  
Gusdelfin

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DaveR](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/sketchup/user_avatar/forums.sketchup.com/daver/32/7601_2.png) [@DaveR](https://forums.sketchup.com/u/DaveR)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2016, 10:11am UTC](https://forums.sketchup.com/t/why-no-sketchyphysics-for-sketchup-2016/20482/11 "2016-07-11T10:11:45Z")

</div>

> [@gusdelfin](#):
>
> ¿Why it does not work the plugin sketchyphysics?

SketchyPhysics _does_ work with 32-bit SketchUp see Cotty’s message above.
