considering how well people fill in their profile around here, it would end up useless after a day
2017 imac pro - 3 GHz 10-Core Intel Xeon W - no 211.4 fps but hey!
AGAIN: reports without mentioning the used screen resolution for SU (not display res.) as well as the AA settings and the used ‘eye candy’ (shadow, fog, x-ray, heavy style) are pretty worthless because not comparable.
well that one is covered by the file, you’re supposed to use the file as is. all the same eye candy.
but sure, my SU windows are 1849x876 and my AA is 0
on the PC it’s a bit narrower and AA0 as well
Not completely thorough, but quick results:
SU 2022 on 2016 16" MacBook Pro, 16 GB, 2.9 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 460 4 GB, with external monitor & Monterey, with the file straight as downloaded:
SU 2024 on 2021 14" MacBook Pro, M1 Max, 64GB, 10 CPU/32GPU, internal display & Ventura with the file straight as downloaded:
with Ambient Occlusion:
with classic engine:
And now the in between comparison:
SU 2024 on 2016 16" MacBook Pro, 16 GB, 2.9 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, Radeon Pro 460 4 GB, with external monitor & Monterey, with the file straight as downloaded and new graphic engine:
So,
- 2016 Intel MBP, SU 2022 vs. 2024 all else the same looks like a 3.75x speed improvement, and
- SU 2024 on the 2016 Intel MBP vs. 2021 M1 Max MBP looks like another 1.82x speed improvement.
Not 100% perfectly done comparison, but interesting.